Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7100T - 142 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $35.17 vs $120.57
- Up to 69% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600KF - $0.29 vs $0.94 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
30%
Price, €
€133.83
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €133.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
133
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €39.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |