Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 252 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - 475 vs 409 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $106.02 vs $277.12
- Up to 67% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.25 vs $0.75 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
475
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Buy for €307.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |