Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 1128 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 253 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $98.71 vs $113.33
- Up to 8% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.46 vs $0.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
92%
Price, €
€125.8
87%
FPS Winner
Buy for €125.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
237
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |