Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 22% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-8120 - 273 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $57.05 vs $106.02
- Up to 35% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-11600KF - $0.28 vs $0.43 per FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
273
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
65%
Price, €
€117.68
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |