Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G4400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Pentium G4400 - 453 vs 381 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $19.74 vs $131.6
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i5-11600K - $0.06 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
453
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
18%
Price, €
€146.08
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
381
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.91
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €21.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |