Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 945 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - $131.6 vs $388.24
- Up to 62% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-14900KF - $0.75 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Resident Evil 4 than Core i5-11600K - 217 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
195
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15279 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
37%
Price, €
€430.95
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |