Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900 - 193 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $127.96 vs $318.06
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 20 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74915 minutes ago
Buy for €353.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74915 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1704
77.95059469350412%
Multi-Core
8421
98.1582935074018%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |