Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in Halo Infinite than Core i7-3770 - 169 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $89.23 vs $131.6
- Up to 26% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i5-11600K - $0.64 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
74%
Price, €
€146.08
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8724 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
154
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €99.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8724 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |