Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1028 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $131.6 vs $270.23
- Up to 48% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i7-14700F - $1.52 vs $2.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Remnant II than Core i5-11600K - 103 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 28 vs 12 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
96
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€146.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14148 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.91/FPS
52%
Price, €
€299.95
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |