Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7500T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7500T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7500T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-7500T - 121 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7500T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7500T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $50.45 vs $131.6
- Up to 55% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11600K - $0.55 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
45%
Price, €
€146.08
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18950 minutes ago
Buy for €56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18951 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7500T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |