Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than Core i5-7400T - 286 vs 267 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $57.05 vs $131.6
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-11600K - $0.24 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
47%
Price, €
€146.08
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
267
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |