Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-5675C on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-5675C is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2132 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-5675C.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 28% better in F1 23 than Core i5-5675C - 276 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $90.74 vs $131.6
- Up to 11% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-11600K - $0.47 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
88%
Price, €
€146.08
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FPS
215
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €100.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |