Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-4690 - 180 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $40.95 vs $138.2
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-11600K - $0.28 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 84 vs 125 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
32.94117647058824%
Price, €
€153.4
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €153.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4952 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
164
91.11111111111111%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4945 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
54.48307410795974%
Multi-Core
3303
38.50099079146754%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-4690 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |