Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 693 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Core i3-9100F - 231 vs 194 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $87.75 vs $131.6
- Up to 21% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600K - $0.5 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
79%
Price, €
€146.08
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
194
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |