Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 927 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100 - 130 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $106.02 vs $131.6
- Up to 13% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600K - $0.97 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
86%
Price, €
€146.08
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13785 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
121
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.97/FPS
100%
Price, €
€117.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |