Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 129% better in League of Legends than Core i3-4150 - 266 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $32.9 vs $131.6
- Up to 44% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-11600K - $0.31 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
266
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
56%
Price, €
€146.08
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12354 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
43%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€36.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €36.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12355 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |