Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 39% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 276 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $71.77 vs $131.6
- Up to 25% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-11600K - $0.4 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
75%
Price, €
€146.08
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
199
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |