Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 19% better in Saints Row than FX-6350 - 174 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $73.12 vs $131.6
- Up to 33% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i5-11600K - $0.56 vs $0.84 per FPS
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
66%
Price, €
€146.08
55%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8550 minutes ago
Buy for €81.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8550 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |