Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4771 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4771 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4771.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 8% better in Valheim than Core i7-4771 - 213 vs 198 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4771 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4771 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4771
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $79.7 vs $102.37
- Up to 15% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11600 - $0.45 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
213
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
84.90566037735849%
Price, €
€113.63
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3737 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
198
92.95774647887323%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
1193
56.2205466540999%
Multi-Core
3857
47.10552027357108%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i7-4771 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |