Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3719 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 80% better in F1 23 than Core i5-2400S - 272 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $51.18 vs $102.37
- Up to 10% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i5-11600 - $0.38 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
90%
Price, €
€113.63
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
151
55%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |