Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-10400 - 252 vs 242 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $91.04 vs $102.37
- Up to 7% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-11600 - $0.42 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
93%
Price, €
€113.63
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11086 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
242
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€101.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €101.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11086 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |