Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-4150 - 325 vs 305 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $30.07 vs $102.37
- Up to 69% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Core i5-11600 - $0.11 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
325
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
31%
Price, €
€113.63
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
305
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€33.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €33.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |