Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 5300G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 5300G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 28 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 5300G.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 6% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 5300G - 120 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $58.49 vs $102.37
- Up to 40% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-11600 - $0.57 vs $0.95 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.95/FPS
60%
Price, €
€113.63
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18559 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
113
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.92
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Cezanne |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |