Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 88% better in F1 23 than FX-8120 - 272 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing F1 23 than FX-8120 - $0.42 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $57.05 vs $102.37
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.63
55%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1612 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
145
53.30882352941176%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
95.45454545454545%
Price, €
€63.32
100%
Buy for €63.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1603 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |