Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 200GE on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 200GE is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 922 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 200GE.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 10% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 200GE - 216 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $51.17 vs $102.37
- Up to 45% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-11600 - $0.29 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
54.71698113207547%
Price, €
€113.63
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3663 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
197
91.20370370370371%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.8
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €56.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3660 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Single-Core
889
41.89443920829406%
Multi-Core
1857
22.679531021006348%
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |