Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7350K - 141 vs 136 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $37.73 vs $107.83
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11500 - $0.31 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 60 vs 65 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
36%
Price, €
€119.69
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for €119.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
136
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €41.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |