Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 19% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8300 - 141 vs 118 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $81.91 vs $107.83
- Up to 9% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-11500 - $0.77 vs $0.85 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.85/FPS
90%
Price, €
€119.69
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for €119.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Buy for €90.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11500 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |