Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2696 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2437 days newer than Xeon E5-2696 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2696 v3 - 114 vs 102 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 36 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2696 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Haswell E |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 18 |
| 12 | Threads | 36 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
