Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3353 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 13% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2650 - 282 vs 249 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-2650
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
