Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 2800 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 65% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 45 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-11400H
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 |
|---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
