Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 3081 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 23% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - 185 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 45 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €30.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
23.432343234323433%
Multi-Core
739
11.6690352123796%
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |