Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 176 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10709 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |