Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4086 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 32% better in World of Warcraft than Pentium G6950 - 200 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $34.71 vs $84.81
- Up to 45% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11400F - $0.26 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
55%
Price, €
€94.14
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15981 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
151
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.53
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15980 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |