Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900 - 442 vs 406 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $84.81 vs $201.79
- Up to 62% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-10900 - $0.21 vs $0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
442
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16103 minutes ago
Buy for €223.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |