Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2844 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4770 - 629 vs 531 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $54.8 vs $84.81
- Up to 27% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-11400F - $0.11 vs $0.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
629
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
73%
Price, €
€94.14
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3226 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
531
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.83
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3227 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i7-4770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |