Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2753 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4440 - 142 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 10% cheaper than Core i5-4440 - $84.81 vs $93.82
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4440 - $0.66 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3417 minutes ago
Buy for €104.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3418 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i5-4440 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |