Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2430 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 11% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-4160 - 187 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $78.96 vs $185.81
- Up to 62% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-4160 - $0.47 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
168
89.83957219251337%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
38.21138211382114%
Price, €
€206.25
42%
Buy for €206.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
54.25803161652218%
Multi-Core
2072
27.23449001051525%
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |