Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2837 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i3-3250 - 225 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $42.67 vs $84.81
- Up to 40% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i5-11400F - $0.25 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
225
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
59%
Price, €
€94.14
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
186
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€47.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €47.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |