Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10320 - 176 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $84.81 vs $87.75
- Up to 9% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-10320 - $0.53 vs $0.58 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5161 minutes ago
Buy for €97.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |