Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F and the cheaper Core i3-10105 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valorant than Core i3-10105 - 842 vs 785 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $65.77 vs $84.81
- Up to 18% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-11400F - $0.09 vs $0.11 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
842
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
81%
Price, €
€94.14
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12008 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
785
93%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€73.01
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €73.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12007 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |