Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3481 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G540 - 140 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $14.07 vs $84.81
- Up to 81% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-11400F - $0.13 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
19%
Price, €
€94.14
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10501 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
117
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10500 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |