Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1078 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G4900 - 282 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $49.74 vs $84.52
- Up to 30% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i5-11400F - $0.23 vs $0.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
282
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
69%
Price, €
€93.82
58%
FPS Winner
Buy for €93.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |