Buy on Amazon
€94.14
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3025 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than Celeron G1610T - 746 vs 668 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
746
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Core i5-11400F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1610T |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.