Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Celeron B820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3180 days newer than Celeron B820.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron B820 - 218 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron B820
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron B820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 17.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |