Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 238 vs 236 FPS
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $84.81 vs $1224.75
- Up to 93% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $0.4 vs $5.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10916 minutes ago
Buy for €1,359.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10916 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |