Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1062 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 2600X - 128 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $73.1 vs $84.81
- Up to 8% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11400F - $0.68 vs $0.74 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
91%
Price, €
€94.14
86%
FPS Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9290 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
119
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €81.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |