Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4737 days newer than the more expensive Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 36% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - 140 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 39% cheaper than Phenom X4 9550 - $84.81 vs $138.89
- Up to 55% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom X4 9550 - $0.67 vs $1.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4872 minutes ago
Buy for €154.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4872 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Phenom X4 9550 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Mar 27th, 2008 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom X4 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Agena |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM2+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 65 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 11.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |