Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 4418 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Phenom II X4 810 - 156 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4775 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 810 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 9th, 2009 |
Core i5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Deneb |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 13.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | No |