Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 587 days newer than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than EPYC 7742 - 842 vs 754 FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 128 vs 12 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
842
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€94.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €94.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9504 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | AMD EPYC 7742 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | EPYC |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Rome |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 64 |
12 | Threads | 128 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 225 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 22.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |