Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 1730 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 626 vs 530 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - $59.8 vs $92.32
- Up to 19% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-11400 - $0.13 vs $0.16 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
626
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
81%
Price, €
€102.47
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for €102.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
530
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |